<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PB Wiki steps up their game. Will Google Sites respond?</title>
	<link>http://terence.mybgsuonline.com/2008/03/14/pb-wiki-steps-up-their-game-will-google-sites-respond/</link>
	<description>Experienced e-Learning Specialist, Entrepreneur, Futurist</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Terence Armentano, M.Ed.</title>
		<link>http://terence.mybgsuonline.com/2008/03/14/pb-wiki-steps-up-their-game-will-google-sites-respond/#comment-80</link>
		<author>Terence Armentano, M.Ed.</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://terence.mybgsuonline.com/2008/03/14/pb-wiki-steps-up-their-game-will-google-sites-respond/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Google Sites has a template in which the team can quickly and easily add the project they are working on, the status, and the target date of completion. It is not as robust as other pm tools, but it works for a small team.  I haven't had a chance to play around with pb wiki 2.0 too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Sites has a template in which the team can quickly and easily add the project they are working on, the status, and the target date of completion. It is not as robust as other pm tools, but it works for a small team.  I haven&#8217;t had a chance to play around with pb wiki 2.0 too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdon</title>
		<link>http://terence.mybgsuonline.com/2008/03/14/pb-wiki-steps-up-their-game-will-google-sites-respond/#comment-79</link>
		<author>bdon</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://terence.mybgsuonline.com/2008/03/14/pb-wiki-steps-up-their-game-will-google-sites-respond/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Interesting, but PB wiki 2.0 still feels more like a robust wiki than a project management tool. At my organization we use Basecamp to manage projects and a wiki to manage knowledge and share best practices. I'd like to hear how people are using PB Wiki or Google Sites to manage projects?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, but PB wiki 2.0 still feels more like a robust wiki than a project management tool. At my organization we use Basecamp to manage projects and a wiki to manage knowledge and share best practices. I&#8217;d like to hear how people are using PB Wiki or Google Sites to manage projects?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
